Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a global score of 77, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s 74.9 score. Motorola Edge 40 Neo's design is incredibly newer and lighter, but also just a bit thicker than the Galaxy A9 (2016). The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a little better screen density, a little bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) counts with a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also has a much better 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a larger aperture.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features much more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.