Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Interstellar Black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a score of 83.4, which is much better than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s general score of 74.9. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a notably newer and just a little lighter cellphone than Galaxy A9 (2016), although it is thicker. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a brighter display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a quite greater pixels count per display inch, a bit larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Galaxy A9 (2016) has an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 4600mAh battery size. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a bigger camera aperture, a much higher video definition and a way more MP back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.