Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is better than Galaxy A9 (2016), with a score of 86.3 against 74.9. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a noticeably newer and just a little lighter device than Galaxy A9 (2016), but it's also just a little bit thicker. Galaxy A9 (2016) counts with a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a better screen than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a little larger screen, a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit more pixels per display inch. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with much more memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a lot bigger aperture and a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.