Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Metal | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a global score of 86.2, which is better than the Galaxy A9 (2016)'s global score of 74.9. The Motorola Moto G200 5G body is newer than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s, although it is thicker and a bit heavier. Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a quite better screen pixels density, a bit larger display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2460.
The Moto G200 5G has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Moto G200 5G has a bit superior processor than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Moto G200 5G features superior battery life than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity. The Moto G200 5G counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G200 5G also has a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.