Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | -- |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | -- |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G84 has a score of 80.9, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A9 (2016)'s 74.9 global score. Although the Motorola Moto G84 is just a little thicker than the Galaxy A9 (2016), it's notably lighter and notably newer. The Moto G84 features a better looking display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a quite bigger display and a quite greater number of pixels in each inch in the screen.
Motorola Moto G84 has a way bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy A9 (2016) has a very superior processor than Moto G84, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Moto G84 takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and a F1.9 aperture, the Motorola Moto G84 also has a lot better resolution back-facing camera and better video frame rates.
The Motorola Moto G84 counts with greater battery life than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.