Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-01-01 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z Force is just a bit better than Galaxy A9 (2016), with a overall score of 75.8 against 74.9. The Moto Z Force is a a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than Galaxy A9 (2016), although both of them were only released 8 months apart. Moto Z Force has a more vivid display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixels density.
Moto Z Force has just a little better performance than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM. Moto Z Force has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Moto Z Force also has a camera with a way better 21 MP resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and video.
The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory. Galaxy A9 (2016) counts with a bit superior battery life than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.