Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2016-01-01 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | 16 777 216 |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z2 Force Edition is just a bit better than the Galaxy A9 (2016), having a overall score of 77.4 against 74.9. Moto Z2 Force Edition's body is newer, somewhat thinner and lighter than Galaxy A9 (2016). Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a sharper display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better screen density.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has 1 GB more RAM memory. The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A9 (2016), although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light captures, a lesser MP resolution camera and a worse video definition.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage. Galaxy A9 (2016) counts with a superior battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.