Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2016-01-01 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Oxford blue |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), getting an 84.6 score against 74.9. Motorola One 5G is a notably newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), although it is just a little heavier and thicker. Motorola One 5G has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola One 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Motorola One 5G features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a bit greater number of pixels in each display inch, a little bit larger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2520px resolution. The Motorola One 5G counts with a greater camera than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One 5G also has a bigger camera aperture for better low light images and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
The Motorola One 5G counts with much more memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola One 5G counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.