Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2016-01-01 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Blue and Brown |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision has a general score of 80.7, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s 74.9 general score. Motorola One Vision's construction is noticeably newer and just a bit lighter, but thicker than Galaxy A9 (2016). Motorola One Vision has a slightly better display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution, a little higher quantity of pixels in each display inch and a little larger display.
Motorola One Vision features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola One Vision also has 1 GB more RAM memory. The Motorola One Vision has a very superior camera than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola One Vision also has a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light images and video.
Motorola One Vision has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A9 (2016) has a little better battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.