Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2016-01-01 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is slightly better than the Galaxy A9 (2016), getting a global score of 80 against 74.9. Motorola One Zoom is a extremely newer and a little bit lighter device than Galaxy A9 (2016), but it is thicker. Motorola One Zoom has a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola One Zoom also has more RAM memory.
The Motorola One Zoom has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a bit larger screen, a just a bit higher pixels density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px. The Motorola One Zoom features a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have a SD memory slot that allows up to 128 GB, the Motorola One Zoom also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola One Zoom's battery performance is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016)'s battery life. The Motorola One Zoom shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola One Zoom also has a camera with a way higher resolution and a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.