Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is better than the Galaxy A9 (2016), getting an 87 score against 74.9. Motorola razr (2020)'s construction is way newer and just a little bit lighter, but just a bit thicker than the Galaxy A9 (2016). The Motorola razr (2020) features a little sharper display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a bit lower resolution of 876 x 2142px, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a little greater amount of pixels in each inch in the display.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola razr (2020) has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
Motorola razr (2020) shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited situations and a back camera with a way higher 48 MP resolution.
The Galaxy A9 (2016) features a superior battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.