Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 77.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2021-11-09 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.75 x 3.14 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.65 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Midnight Blue |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.46 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4470mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia X100 has a global score of 77.3, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s score of 74.9. The Nokia X100 design is a lot newer, but just a little bit heavier and thicker than the Galaxy A9 (2016). Nokia X100 counts with just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a little bit higher pixels amount per display inch, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little larger display.
The Nokia X100 has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Nokia X100 also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy A9 (2016) shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Nokia X100, although it has a back-facing camera with much less mega pixels.
Nokia X100 counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Nokia X100 has a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 4470mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.