Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2021-05-01 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.65 x 3.14 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Midnight Sun and Nordic Blue |
| Metal | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 2400 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.46 | 8.8 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4470mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia X20 has a global score of 77.2, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s 74.9 global score. The Nokia X20 body is notably newer, but somewhat thicker and just a bit heavier than the Galaxy A9 (2016). The Nokia X20 features a little bit better screen than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a bit bigger screen, a bit more pixels per inch of screen and a little higher resolution of 2400 x 1080 pixels.
The Nokia X20 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Nokia X20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Nokia X20 counts with a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB and more internal memory capacity.
The Nokia X20 counts with a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 4470mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) takes clearer photographs and videos than Nokia X20, although it has a way worse 13 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.