Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 is a little bit better than the Galaxy A9 (2016), having an 80.8 score against 74.9. The Nokia XR20 is a notably newer cellphone than Galaxy A9 (2016), although it's way heavier and way thicker. The Nokia XR20 features just a little better processing power than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Nokia XR20 also has more RAM.
The Nokia XR20 counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a just a bit higher pixels count per inch in the screen and a little larger display. The Nokia XR20 takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Nokia XR20 also has a back camera with a lot better resolution, faster video frame rate and a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited environments.
Nokia XR20 counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 96 GB more internal storage. Nokia XR20 counts with just a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 16% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.