Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Ocean |
| Metal | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), getting an 83.1 score against 74.9. OPPO Find X2 Pro's construction is noticeably newer than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016)'s, although it's a little heavier and thicker. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a little bigger display, a greater amount of pixels per display inch and a much higher 1440 x 3168 resolution.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has better video frame rate, a lot higher resolution camera and a larger camera aperture.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X2 Pro has just a little better battery life than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 4260mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.