Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 is a bit better than Galaxy A9 (2016), getting a overall score of 76.1 against 74.9. The Galaxy A22 construction is notably newer and just a little bit lighter than the Galaxy A9 (2016)'s, but it is also somewhat thicker. Galaxy A9 (2016) has a slightly better screen than Galaxy A22, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display density and a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920px.
Samsung Galaxy A22 has a little bit better performance than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A22 also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A22, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and video and a camera with lot less mega-pixels, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy A22 features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A9 (2016) counts with a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.