Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), getting a global score of 79.9 against 74.9. Even though Galaxy A25 5G is somewhat thicker than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), it's a little bit lighter and extremely newer. The Galaxy A9 (2016) features a very superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a bit larger screen, a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit greater screen pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a way better 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures and videos.
Galaxy A25 5G has a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.