Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | -- |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A35 5G has an overall score of 79.4, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016)'s 74.9 score. Even though Galaxy A35 5G is much newer than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), it's just a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) has a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a quite higher screen pixels density, a little bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. Galaxy A35 5G has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a larger camera aperture for better captures and videos in low light situations and a back facing camera with a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A35 5G has longer battery duration than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.