Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A41 has an overall score of 81.7, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s score of 74.9. The Samsung Galaxy A41 design is newer and lighter than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s, but it is also just a bit thicker. Galaxy A41 features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy A41 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A41 counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit bigger display. The Galaxy A41 features a better camera than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A41 also counts with a much higher resolution camera.
The Galaxy A41 counts with a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. Galaxy A9 (2016) has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A41, because it has a 14 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.