Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2016-01-01 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | -- |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is a lot better than the Galaxy A9 (2016)'s 74.9 global score. The Galaxy A52 design is noticeably newer and a little lighter, but also thicker than Galaxy A9 (2016). The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a bit greater amount of pixels per inch of display, a little bit larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Galaxy A52 features a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 96 GB more internal storage and a SD card slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A52 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A52 takes greater pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 also has a back camera with a much higher resolution and a bigger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited situations.
The Galaxy A52 counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.