Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is much better than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), having a global score of 91.1 against 74.9. Samsung Galaxy A52s's construction is newer and just a little lighter, but also somewhat thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016). The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a just a little higher number of pixels in each inch of screen and a quite bigger display.
Galaxy A52s counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52s also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A52s has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy A52s shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A52s also has a larger camera aperture to take better low light photos and videos and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.