Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Prism bricks black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), getting a overall score of 92.9 against 74.9. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW design is way newer and a little lighter, but somewhat thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016). The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a quite greater pixels density, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bigger display.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has more internal storage and a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW takes a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a lot more mega-pixels back camera and a larger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.