Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | -- |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F23 has a general score of 84.6, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016)'s overall score of 74.9. Although the Galaxy F23 is thicker than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), it's way lighter and also incredibly newer. The Galaxy F23 features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2408 pixels resolution, a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a quite larger display.
The Galaxy F23 has a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy F23 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy F23 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy F23 has better battery duration than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) shoots slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy F23, although it has a back facing camera with lot less mega-pixels and a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.