Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-01-01 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is a lot better than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s 74.9 global score. The Samsung Galaxy Fold design is newer and just a little bit thinner, but way heavier than Galaxy A9 (2016). Galaxy Fold features just a little better performance than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Fold also has 9 GB more RAM.
Galaxy Fold has a little bit better display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a little bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a higher 1536 x 2152 resolution and a bigger display. Galaxy Fold captures a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a lower 12 MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way larger aperture for better photography in low light environments.
The Galaxy Fold has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 10% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.