Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2016-01-01 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a score of 90.8, which is a lot better than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s 74.9 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a incredibly newer and just a little lighter device than the Galaxy A9 (2016), although it is thicker. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a bit higher pixels density and a little bigger display. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a camera in the back with lesser megapixels, it also counts with a way better video resolution and a larger aperture to take better captures and video in low light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.