Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Black, Pink and White |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), with an 81.2 score against 74.9. Samsung Galaxy Note 3's construction is somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), although it's somewhat thicker and was released many years before. Galaxy Note 3 counts with a brighter display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with a bit higher pixel amount per screen inch.
Galaxy Note 3 has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has less cores , and they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the Galaxy Note 3 also counts with an additional graphics processor. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A9 (2016), although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures or video in low light environments, they both have a same resolution back camera, the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports 64 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A9 (2016) counts with improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.