Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2016-01-01 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is better than the Galaxy A9 (2016), having an 89 score against 74.9. The Galaxy Note10 construction is newer and lighter, but also just a bit thicker than the Galaxy A9 (2016). The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a little bit better display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a little bit larger screen, a just a little greater quantity of pixels in each inch of display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2280px resolution.
The Galaxy Note10 has a very superior memory for apps and games than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy Note10 has a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A9 (2016) has a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Note10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy Note10 takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a worse resolution back-facing camera and a lower (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a way bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.