Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2016-01-01 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 5.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note4 has an overall score of 77.6, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016)'s global score of 74.9. Although Samsung Galaxy Note4 is older and somewhat thicker than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), it's body is still somewhat lighter. Samsung Galaxy Note4 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016). Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and a 3 GB RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note4 has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher screen pixel density. Samsung Galaxy Note4 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting images and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Note4 also counts with a back facing camera with a better 16 mega-pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) and Samsung Galaxy Note4 both feature quite similar memory capacity to install games and applications, both of them have the same 32 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 128 GB. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has a 24% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.