Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-01-01 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G has a global score of 93.6, which is way better than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s 74.9 global score. The Galaxy S10 5G is a way newer and a bit lighter phone than the Galaxy A9 (2016), but it's also just a bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a better screen than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a higher screen pixel density, a little bit bigger screen and a lot higher 1440 x 3040px resolution. Galaxy S10 5G captures a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a lower video resolution and a lesser megapixels camera, it also counts with a lot larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited situations.
Galaxy S10 5G features a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S10 5G has just a bit better battery life than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 13% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.