Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016)'s overall score of 74.9. The Galaxy S20 design is noticeably newer and somewhat lighter, but a bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016). The Galaxy S20 has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S20 also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 3200, a lot higher pixels density and a little bit bigger display. The Galaxy S20 counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a back facing camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a much higher video resolution and a larger camera aperture for better captures and videos in low light environments.
The Galaxy S20 has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy S20 counts with a battery performance that is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.