Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a global score of 98, which is much better than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s overall score of 74.9. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is noticeably newer, but somewhat thicker and a little bit heavier than the Galaxy A9 (2016). Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 9 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a greater display pixels density, a larger display and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 96 GB more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a larger aperture for better low light photos and videos and a camera with a much higher 108 megapixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has superior battery life than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 25% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.