Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 has a score of 93.4, which is much better than the Galaxy A9 (2016)'s 74.9 general score. Although the Galaxy S22 is a little thicker than Galaxy A9 (2016), it's somewhat lighter and notably newer. Galaxy S22 features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S22 also has 5 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a just a bit higher pixel amount in each inch of screen, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite larger display. The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a much bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy A9 (2016) counts with a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy S22, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a greater camera than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a back camera with much more mega-pixels, a much better video quality and a larger diafragm aperture for better captures in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.