Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), getting a score of 95.4 against 74.9. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's construction is noticeably newer than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016)'s, but it is somewhat heavier and thicker. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a higher pixels amount per screen inch, a bit bigger screen and a much higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution. Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a much better 108 MP resolution back-facing camera, a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video and a way better video quality.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.