Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2016-01-01 | -- |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | -- |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | -- |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S23 is just a bit better than the Galaxy A9 (2016), having a 77.9 score against 74.9. Samsung Galaxy S23's body is much lighter but just a little bit thicker than the Galaxy A9 (2016). The Galaxy A9 (2016) features a much better performing processor than Galaxy S23, although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) has just a bit better screen than Galaxy S23, although it has a bit worse 1080 x 1920px resolution, a bit lower pixels density and a little bit smaller screen. The Galaxy S23 counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos and videos.
Galaxy S23 has a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S23, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.