Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2016-01-01 | -- |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 7.05 ounces | -- |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | -- |
| Metal | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM + eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S24 Ultra is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), with a overall score of 80.2 against 74.9. Galaxy S24 Ultra is a extremely thinner and way lighter phone than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016). Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) counts with a much powerful processor than Galaxy S24 Ultra, although it has 5 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy S24 Ultra counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has more pixels per display inch, a bit larger display and a lot better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution. The Galaxy S24 Ultra features much more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S24 Ultra counts with greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh. The Galaxy S24 Ultra counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.