Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-01-01 | -- |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 7.05 ounces | -- |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | -- |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is better than Galaxy A9 (2016), with a score of 82.6 against 74.9. Galaxy S25 is a way thinner and a lot lighter cellphone than Galaxy A9 (2016). The Galaxy S25 has a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a just a little greater display density, a quite larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The Galaxy A9 (2016) has a way better hardware performance than Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy S25 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a much better video quality, a bigger aperture to take better low-light images and a back camera with a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy S25's battery lifetime is just as good as the battery duration in Galaxy A9 (2016).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.