Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-01-01 | -- |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 7.05 ounces | -- |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | -- |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a global score of 90.7, which is way better than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s score of 74.9. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's body is incredibly lighter and notably thinner than Galaxy A9 (2016). Galaxy A9 (2016) has a way better performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has an incredibly better display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a quite bigger display and a better amount of pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with better battery duration than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. The Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a back-facing camera with lot more MP and a larger aperture to capture better low light photography.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.