Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | -- |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.46 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a global score of 77.6, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016)'s general score of 74.9. Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's body is way newer, but somewhat heavier and notably thicker than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016). The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) counts with an extremely better processor than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) has a bit better display than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has a just a bit inferior pixels number per display inch, a little smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) shoots slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and a back-facing camera with way less mega-pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 4050mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.