Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-01-01 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 367 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s 74.9 score. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's design is extremely newer than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s, although it is heavier and noticeably thicker. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot better pixel quantity per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 64 GB internal storage and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and video, it also counts with a camera in the back with more MP and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little better battery life than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.