Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Black |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s general score of 74.9. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a extremely newer cellphone than the Galaxy A9 (2016), although it is thicker and a little heavier. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a bit bigger screen and a just a little better pixels amount in each inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has more internal memory and a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos and a way better 25 megapixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.