Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much better than the Galaxy A9 (2016), with a global score of 88.5 against 74.9. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's construction is newer, just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than Galaxy A9 (2016). Galaxy Z Flip features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a little bit greater pixels number per inch of screen, a little bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip captures just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a worse (4K) video resolution and a camera with lesser megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A9 (2016) counts with improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 21 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.