Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.46 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a general score of 85.6, which is better than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s 74.9 score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 design is a lot newer, just a little lighter and a little bit thinner than the Galaxy A9 (2016). Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a quite larger screen, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a little greater screen pixels density. Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy A9 (2016) counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing photographs or videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a better resolution. The Galaxy A9 (2016) counts with better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 21 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.