Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is way better than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s score of 74.9. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a extremely newer cellphone, and it's also a little thinner and a little bit lighter than Galaxy A9 (2016). The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit better display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a little bit better number of pixels per inch in the screen, a little larger display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a very superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a slightly better camera than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a lesser mega pixels camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better images and video in low-light environments. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) has better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.