Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is way better than the Galaxy A9 (2016)'s 74.9 global score. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is noticeably heavier than the Galaxy A9 (2016), it's just a little thinner and also extremely newer. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a bigger display, a higher 1768 x 2208 resolution and a just a little more pixels per screen inch. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video quality and a lesser mega pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little better battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 13% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.