Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 84.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2024-02-22 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.35 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.75 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Black, Blue, Titanium Gray and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.51") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 14 Ultra is much better than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), getting an 84.4 score against 74.9. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra body is notably newer, but somewhat thicker and a little heavier than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016). The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) features a much more powerful processor than Xiaomi 14 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi 14 Ultra features a much sharper screen than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a greater pixel number per screen inch, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a little larger screen. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography in low light environments and a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution camera.
The Xiaomi 14 Ultra has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra features better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.