Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Blasting black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is much better than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), having a 90.1 score against 74.9. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a much newer phone than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), but it's just a little bit heavier and extremely thicker. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a better looking display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a bigger screen, a greater screen density and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture, a much more mega pixels back facing camera and better 60 fps video frame rates. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.