Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2022-04-04 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has a score of 78.7, which is a bit better than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s 74.9 general score. Even though the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro is newer than Galaxy A9 (2016), it is way thicker and a bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) features just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, although it has a quite smaller display, a little lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a just a bit worse display pixel density.
Galaxy A9 (2016) features a much better performing CPU than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, although it has 5 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro features a lot better camera than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro also has higher video frame rates, a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and videos and a back camera with a much higher 108 megapixels resolution.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 16 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.