Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 90 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2020-10-01 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Aurora blue, Cosmic black and Lunar silver |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 650 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro is much better than Galaxy A9 (2016), with a 90 score against 74.9. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro is a extremely newer phone than the Galaxy A9 (2016), but it's way thicker and a little bit heavier. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro counts with a better display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch of display, a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit larger display. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro features much more memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture. Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.