Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2021-03-29 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 8.25 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Ceramic Black and Ceramic White |
| Metal | Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 8.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is way better than Galaxy A9 (2016), having a 90.7 score against 74.9. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is a newer phone than the Galaxy A9 (2016), but it is heavier and somewhat thicker. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also has more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a way better 1440 x 3200 resolution, a better number of pixels per inch in the display and a little bit bigger screen. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have a F1.9 camera aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a way more mega pixels camera.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.