Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-01-01 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a score of 82.7, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016)'s global score of 74.9. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's body is a lot newer and just a little lighter, but thicker than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016). The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a little sharper display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a quite bigger screen, a quite better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a just a little more pixels per display inch. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a much bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture for better photography and videos in low light environments, a back facing camera with way more megapixels and faster video frame rates.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a battery life that's just as good as the battery duration in Galaxy A9 (2016).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.